When Baal’s Canon’s Run Out of Cannon Balls
(Canon 3351 – a.k.a.- If this doesn’t piss you off. . .)
(i) In 1535 King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar* banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”. By 1539 he did the same for large religious estates. By 1540, (32 Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non-wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”.
In 1545, King Henry VIII re-introduced a title directly connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same immoral, unlawful dictates continued into the 21st Century. These underhanded dictates concerned Birth Certificates, and forbade the poor from travelling – except for work – or from claiming their own time and activities as their own, and whether to work or not to work. All people (except the ruling elite), particularly Mediterranean’s were then declared as slaves and were either to be gainfully employed by a Lord or Master, (Barony) to work until death, or, if found to be idle, were arrested, permanently branded with a “V” and sold into slavery or exterminated.
The only exemption from the rule, (think agents of propaganda) were those who satisfied status-quo by learning and teaching the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549. Instead, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572.
In 1589, Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, using Dictate-31 El c.7, updated laws which accelerated the disenfranchisement of landed peasants into landless paupers came to be. Peasants required parish permission to erect dwellings. Having a ‘home’ became a granted privilege, resulting in mass hostility against England as a den of slavery, exploitation and superstitious edicts.
A new act was introduced in 1601 (43 El. c.2 and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3) to begin to industrialize, disguise and even to franchise slavery with the introduction of overseers – Reeve of the Shire, or ‘Sheriff of the poor’ as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish, and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”. Thus, the Apprenticeship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the Non-Christian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the “Poor Rates” (now called “council taxes”) against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and (v) Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14 Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” were then rolled into one document. Their slave ‘value’ being estimated at what labour output could be expected over an average lifetime. . . .kind of like, sayyyyy, buying the ever-offered warranty on modern day purchases?
Soooo, A child’s birthplace was its place of settlement (original estimated value), unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate. However, from the age of 7 upward, the child could have been apprenticed, (read kidnapped) and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”.
The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor, the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also changed the age of “emancipation” from ‘child slavery’ into ‘adult slavery’ at the age of 16; and (vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14 Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”.
If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers – read Sheriff). From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination, the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” as when a modern-day sheriff removes people from their home.
In 1667 (19 Car.2 c.4) the concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England. This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and (viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable, and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown; and . . .
All existing Previous ‘acts’ were continued, and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; aaaand . . .
Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and (xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve.
Too, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status, is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religion invented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity.
The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as “P” (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon) used today; and (xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more, making at that time, more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and (xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of Settlement Certificates as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, (think Maritime Canadians families broken and shipped to either Upper Canada or Louisianna) such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation; and (xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive.
Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices” (xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”.
Thus, the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society; and (xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22), Westminster declared all the poor mental “infants” as too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, and were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality, and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals – being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies. This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and (xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109), English Parliament effectively “privatized” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become “landless paupers” and therefore in need of parish assistance.
In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the “War of Independence”. Almost the entire Patriot militia were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwallis of the East India Company Red Army.
The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and (xviii) Because of the deliberate “legal” theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly “employed” in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacrilegious framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act). Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being “wage slavery” or “lawful slavery” was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked “to death”; and (xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes.
Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all “paupers” disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful (“voluntary”) slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and(xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”.
The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70), Public Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89) and the Public Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”. Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of (xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws, however, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form of a Birth Certificate within present Western Roman Systems: (i) Whilst the same general form and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate may be used (eg a Bond, or other form of Security), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate”; and (ii) (There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate” (when it is most likely the term Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact the real question is the use of the information; and (iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form of a Birth Certificate is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns: (i) The historic record of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English, continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and (ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s. However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41).
[Authors note: Borrowed with thanks and adapted for brevity from Anna Von Reitz Fri 15th June 2018.] http://annavonreitz.com/babyslavetrade.pdf
* Magyar tribes were the ancient building blocks of the modern-day Hungarian peoples. The (Magyars) lived in clans in the region of the Ural Mountains. In the later 800’s, they initiated a conquest upon the Carpathian Basin and, once established, formed the Principality of Hungary. It is believed that the confederation of these tribes was likely governed by two high princes: the Kende or ‘spiritual leader’ and the Gyula or ‘Military leader. These princes were either elected by the leaders of the clans Khagan (council) of the persistent, influential Jewish Khazars.** Around 862 AD the seven tribes separated from the Khazars. Before 881 AD three Turkic tribes rebelled against the rule of the Khagan by the Khazars, but they were suppressed. After their defeat they left the Khazar Empire and voluntarily joined the Hétmagyar confederation. The three tribes were organised into one tribe, called Kabar, and later they played the roles of vanguard and rear guard during the joint military actions of the confederation. The joining of the three tribes to the previous seven created the On-ogur (Ten Arrows), one of the possible origins for the name Hungarian.
**the Khazars, peoples of Turkic origin, converted to the Jewish religion sometime in the 9th century, [800’s} beginning with the royal house and spreading gradually among the general populace. Judaism is now known to have been more widespread among the Khazar inhabitants of the Khazar kingdom than was previously thought.
Holy Slave-shit-balls, Batman!!!
Soooo, using a 9th century Khazarian Zionist slavery model, Henry VIII, in the 1530’s, seeded what has grown to become the ever-persistent Deep State Globalists, who have tried anything and everything; the Russian Revolution to the Spanish Flu, the endless succession of constant wars, the environment, racism to the current Vax hoax and fake Ukraine war, to try to silence and disarm the ‘We the People’ people.
And all to no avail. The internet and all of its aimlessly, constantly, fact -checked Rebels have shone an increasingly brighter light on the ancient Cabal. Anons have forced them to fire their cannon barrels to melting point and exhaust their endless supply of repetitious cannon balls – media, penalties, mandates, brutality, division, fear and hate – with provable, referenced truths.
Can’t you just picture them. Dashing through the Captains Quarters gathering cutlery, candlesticks, coins, tableware, scuttling through the ships-carpenter’s shop for nails, screws, bolts, chains, blades, hammers, chisels – blocks of wood. ANYTHING they might tamp into the barrels of their cannons afront of the powder charge, to take just one more shot at the angry armadas and furious fleets of invading masses. Missing every shot. And the rats fleeing the ship.
Cannons and Canons aside, the most recent “war” fear porn turns out not quite to be a war. More like a further and final disarming of the Globalist Cabal by targeted destruction of their evil, criminal income sources – that being the systematic, targeted destruction of their criminal operations.
Less like a war and more like a Mission?
To get a little more clarity on why the whole world is in a frenzy, you might want to spend some time watching this series by Janet Ossebaard entitled: The Sequel to the Fall of The Cabal
Maurice St. Jean. Managing editor, Parrhesias.com